Crumbs: REVIEWS » The Office » Season 6 » New Leads
Login/Register
56
/100

The Office

The Office is a comedy set in a paper sales company Dunder Mifflin. Shot in a mockumentary style the show follows the exploits of regional manager Michael Scott whose excruciating behaviour can make life difficult for his fellow employees. NBC 2005-???

53
/100

Episode 20 - New Leads

23 March 2010

Review

Synopsis: Sabre's corporate culture is very sales focussed. As a result the sales team become overbearing and arrogant. Sabre pays a lot of money for some new leads and when they arrive Michael decides to take a stand. To teach sales a lesson he gives the leads to all the non-sales staff. One of the batches of leads ends up at the dump and Michael and Dwight head over there to find it.

The Good: The switch in corporate cultures is a believable change of dynamic in the workplace. The new power of the sales team is a logical development and to build a story around that makes sense. Michael's response to change and losing respect was understandable and predictable. His attempt to teach Jim a lesson with clues and maps seemed right up his alley and it's good to see the continuity of their relationship. During the co-managers storyline they had to work together far more closely than ever before so it makes sense that Michael still treats Jim as if he wants his respect and support.

Andy and Erin are continuing their fun chemistry and starting to become one of the best parts of the show. Andy's awkward, hot-under-the-collar miscommunication over where she had hidden his leads was a fun moment well acted. Then later on when he needs some practical advice on how to appease the non-sales staff I loved her head-in-the-clouds response that people "like shells from far away beeches."

Stanley taking sides in Ryan and Kelly's latest fight (in order to get his leads back) was a funny moment. "The Kardashians are a good show" he says without a hint of sincerity.

The Bad: This episode would have been far more effective if Jo had laid down the "Salesmen are King" concept in the previous episode. As plausible as it is that this change would lead to arrogance on the part of the regular characters it seemed unconvincing for its swiftness at times. Several jokes could have used a lot more build up such as Andy wrestling with Darryl over a pencil. It looked contrived and made you wonder why Andy couldn't walk three feet to someone else's desk. Similarly if we had seen Phyllis growing in arrogance then perhaps her calling Michael "numnuts" would have been much funnier.

That's not to say that this was a bad episode or a bad story at all. But throughout there was something forced about it and I think a little forward planning could have made this an enjoyable story arc instead of a one-episode gag. Instead we got Darryl being reduced to zero subtlety as he persuades Michael that the sales team ruined his sandwich. Then in one of those horribly scripted lines Dwight thought "trash" was a metaphor for Meredith who happily took off her clothes immediately, a moment that had no credibility. The final resolution didn't quite work as well as it should either. Again if the story had had more time to sink in then the punch line where the rest of the office accepts cake instead of cash as a peace offering would have been much funnier. There could have also been some interesting moral questions posed especially with Jim on one side, but as it is he was happy to keep his money and the joke fell flat.  

The Michael and Dwight storyline had little going for it either. Although you can trace the dislocation of their friendship back through the regime changes in the office, it seemed like they were fighting just for the cheap laughs. The unconvincing dump background did not help those scenes either, drawing the viewer's eye away from the content.

Comic Highlight: Nice guy Gabe has played his role really well so far, acting trapped and obedient throughout. Here we only hear him on the phone trying to reason with Michael. As he gallantly plays along with one of Michael's wandering metaphors he says genuinely "I don't want to incentivise murder."

That's what I said: This episode was a little off, the story and the jokes didn't land because of a lack of build up. But we are back to inter-office stories here and that may bode well for the rest of the season.

Feedback

Add your comments on this episode below. They may be included in the weekly podcasts.

Post your comment

Comments

  • Great point. I suspect Brando will agree with you. You're right he's now invested in the branch and he can't really look from the outside any more. I actually find it more convincing when he gets mad now. When he yelled at Michael because Michael was dating Pam's mum I really felt for him - and laughed.

    Posted by The TV Critic, 23/03/2010 7:26pm (2 years ago)

  • In reply to Brando's comment about Jim being more effective as 'Jim' than as 'JimandPam', I feel this has become a fault of the writers.

    Jim was a guy who mocked the banality of the office, but, who revealed a sensitive side as he pursued Pam. Now days though, after pursuing a career in the very job he says he hates, I feel he has lost some of that depth. Those desperate looks or smirks he used to do, just don't mean as much anymore.

    I feel Pam is not the thing that has ruined Jim, it's the fact he has lost that believable alienation and desperation he use to feel when he was in the office.

    Posted by Paul W, 23/03/2010 7:05pm (2 years ago)

  • Good review, possibly the lack of build up to this episode is a result of complaints from fans who don't like episodes to be slowed down by plot build up. For example, many reviews for 602 show this compliant.
    But otherwise, it was great to see all the supporting cast get at least 2 or 3 lines each and play a part in the main plot. I also enjoyed the focus on the main plot rather than several subplots.

    Posted by Ben Fishman, 20/03/2010 6:45pm (2 years ago)

  • While this wasn't a great episode I do believe it's the first time in weeks that I've felt mostly satisfied with an episode of The Office. I felt it was a pretty decent night from the NBC comedies. Perhaps a little underwhelming, but I did like that it was an inter-office story as you mentioned.

    At the start of the trash dump scene I was appalled at the story once again getting lost in its own banality, but the resolution of it (the cathartic confrontation which not only released their anger toward each other but also resolved their drifting friendship a bit) was well worth it. To see Dwight and Michael back as a team could prove a great move for this show, in my opinion.

    Is it bad that I feel like Jim is a much more effective and enjoyable character when Pam isn't around? I feel like it allows him to be "Jim" in the office (and in his interactions with other office mates) rather than having to be "Jimandpam."

    Posted by Brando from the Cinemaphiles, 20/03/2010 5:12pm (2 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments