Crumbs: Reviews » Comedies » The Office » Season 8 » The List
Critical reviews of U.S. TV shows
and analysis of what makes them
good, bad, irritating and enlightening.
54
/100
Viewer
35
/100

The Office

The Office is a comedy set in a paper sales company Dunder Mifflin. Shot in a mockumentary style the show follows the exploits of regional manager Michael Scott whose excruciating behaviour can make life difficult for his fellow employees. NBC 2005-???

53
/100

Episode 1 - The List

23 February 2012

Synopsis: New branch manager Robert California has become new Sabre CEO with Andy as his branch manager. Erin gets left with Robert's note book and sees a list of his employees' names written in two columns. Everyone becomes concerned over what the list means and when Robert takes one group to lunch the other group become paranoid. Pam is pregnant (with a boy) as is Angela.

The Good: The new era for The Office begins in mixed fashion. I guess you could look at the encouraging signs from this episode and hope things are going to get better. Or you could look at the worryingly familiar signs and assume that nothing has really changed. I'm more with the latter but I won't deny there were some good things going on here.

Robert California didn't shine as he did in the season finale. Doubtless it will take time for the writers to work out how best to use him and that's fine. The plot with the list of names was ok. We've had so many new bosses that it felt a bit familiar. Remember DeAngelo's inner circle (723)? However at least there was some logic to this. For a start he is the CEO and he has this weird psychological control over people so it's natural that people would care what he thinks. He also picked a group of "winners" who are the most productive workers in the office (aside from Kevin). His honesty was also refreshing. Instead of a Michel-like justification of his actions he just came out with his assessment of everyone as either winners or losers and challenged them to prove him wrong (or right). If he continues to be a straight talking boss that could be good for the show. It could be.

The choice of Andy as branch manager is far more precarious a decision. I'm 95% sure I won't like it but at least Andy's attempt to vouch for his fellow workers felt more authentically affectionate than when Michael did similar things.

As usual Jim and Pam could be relied upon for the simple and effective emotional stuff (also see Comic Highlight). Pam's emotional vulnerability made some sense as she fretted over being in the losers camp. Jim's final note for her with his own winners and losers (his family v everything else) list was touching. Again simple and effective.

The Bad: What makes me doubt that this really is a new era is that so much of what was on display was the same stuff we have been seeing for the last three years.

Andy as branch manager feels disconcertingly like a Michael Scott replacement. He cares too much what other people think of him and talks around a problem rather than being direct. I worry that the writers will just try and replay Michael plots with Andy taking his place. The fact that his co-workers don't really respect him is a difficult situation too.

Dwight continues to lack proper definition. As far as we know he is still a law abiding citizen and good employee yet he physically attacks the "losers." Why would he think that was a good idea? What would that accomplish? Later he sprays water at Creed to brag about his status. I can understand the bragging but why spray water on Creed? That didn't suit Dwight, it was fine for Kevin.

Similarly why on earth would Stanley make up a catch phrase? That makes no sense. His whole character is built around not caring about his co-workers and wanting to avoid all silly shenanigans. "It's my thing now" just doesn't sound like something he would ever say. I can understand Oscar nodding along, trying to look smart in front of Robert but it's sad to see Darryl doing the same. His character badly needs to be redefined as having more of a backbone. The planking was another silly gimmick that just undermines the sense that this is a real workplace.

Finally it's worth asking what kind of pseudo documentary we are watching when Robert can talk Jo into vacating her position in favour of him. That's a Family Guy plot not something that should happen in a simulation of the real world. Don't get me wrong, I much prefer Robert to Jo as a part of the show. But I also prefer logic to silliness.

Comic Highlight: Pam joking that she and Jim are going to call their baby Michael Scott. Though to be fair I did love Andy's attempt at inoffensive small talk with the line "Kind of a medium year for women's soccer, no?"

That's what I said: I think the wait to see if The Office writers have learnt any lessons from the shows decline in quality will have to wait for another episode. This was passable.

Feedback

Add your comments on this episode below. They may be included in the weekly podcasts.

Post your comment

Comments

  • No worries, all posts welcome :-)

    I think having a sensible boss would work fine if the stories were about work. I just think the writers have become obsessed with power struggles or the manager trying to interfere in people's non-work business.

    So even if they made Pam boss I think all the stories would be about her trying to keep power and being disrespected by the sales team etc.

    I think the show would benefit from any attempt to pull back on the craziness.

    Posted by The TV Critic, 30/09/2011 11:40am (8 months ago)

  • I gather - from reading previous reviews- that you prefer the show in "ensemble mode" as opposed to "Michael dominating and everyone else reacting to him", but I think the show really needs a centre, otherwise I can see it all becoming a bit of a mess. But who? Jim is too passive and impassionate about anything except Pam to be a lead protagonist (occasional, sporadic spurts of "trying" (413-414, etc) aside, he rarely drives the narrative); Ryan has been re-characterized too many times, and has of course been boss before (and the actor lacks presence beyond that of a supporting player); and Dwight, has mentioned before, has been turned into a joke.

    Personally, I think making Pam manager would have been a better idea. Pam has been a consistently well-written character throughout, showing a desire to grow and branch out over time (walking over the hot coals, the Michael Scott Paper Company arc, etc). Even her failure at Art school was at least an attempt at striving for something, more than Jim or most of the rest of the office can claim. That's she's always been a real person and never descended into a caricature also helps considerably.

    Pam as the boss? The former quiet receptionist turned Manager, trying to gain authority over the office? Juggling the role with motherhood and her second pregnancy? Struggling at first but persevering? A reverse Michael-Ryan dynamic between her and Erin (Erin sees Pam as her mentor, Pam isn't interested)? Separating the personal from the professional by choosing Dwight as her number 2 over Jim (a case can be made for this)? Could have been interesting.

    (Sorry if this post is a little "what I would have done", rather than commenting simply on what is. Bit of a backseat driver, I know).

    PS. Love the site.

    Posted by freemo, 30/09/2011 7:11am (8 months ago)

  • Hi Freemo,

    I very much agree with your analysis of Dwight's character. The writers have looked to him more and more to be the voice of exaggerated humour that doesn't suit the serious person that he once was.

    What you suggest at the end is something that I agree with but which the writers aren't interested in. Namely taking the actual business of Dunder Miflin seriously.

    I think the stories would be far more organic if we got a sense of the actual business the company did. I would like to see more of how each of the sales staff actually sell. Stories could be built around big clients that the company is chasing etc. But the last three seasons have seen that element of the show dwindle to almost non-existence. It's a real shame.

    Thanks for commenting.

    Posted by The TV Critic, 29/09/2011 7:46pm (8 months ago)

  • I'm interested in your thoughts on Dwight.

    In the early seasons I really liked the way Dwight was defined.

    Dwight the nerd who wears short-sleeve business shirts, collects bobble heads and watches Lost, Alias, Battlestar Gallactica, Survivor and The Apprentice. Dwight the best salesman in the entire company ("g is for good worker, h is for hard worker. Never taken a sick day"). Dwight the go-getter and joiner (volunteer sheriff’s deputy on weekends, laser tag team on Wednesday nights). Dwight the expert on everything. Dwight the serious, strict, pedantic, security-conscious enforcer of rules and regulations, who respects only the chain of command.

    In the end, I think it's Dwight's bizarre quasi-Amish upbringing that's one that's one element too many, the one that leads to character contradictions, and more weight than the character can hold. The Dwight that suggests stupid ideas like "fights to the death", stuffs a live cat into a freezer, etc has pulled the other elements of his character toward that of a cartoonish caricature. He (and the show) have been in decline since Season 4. The writers inability to come up with a decent ongoing storyline for him hasn't helped (The Dwight/Angela/Andy triangle was particularly painful to sit through).

    His brief taste of power as Regional Manger in the Season 3 finale (a great episode, IMO, and what would have been a great finale for the series as a whole), should have made him hungry for more. An arc of Dwight either in the Manager role or in pursuit of it could have had great possibilities. As a boss he's in many ways the complete opposite of Michael: a) has no desire to be loved by his "subordinates", b) sticks to his absolute convictions, and c) believes "work time is for work, not fun", while also maintains a very healthy work/life balance. We're repeatedly told that he's an exceptional saleman, so he must a) be able to get along with people on some level, and b) be able to perform work duties to a high standard. Imagine if office discontent was high under his command, but sales numbers were too. If the staff hated him, but the clients and corporate loved him. Or if Jim tried to rally the others against him, but found no support for his cause.

    Posted by freemo, 29/09/2011 8:26am (8 months ago)

  • Oh, and a couple more things:

    * I hope they don't lose the beat from the finale of Robert California having Dwight figured out and having stared him down. That moment was so wonderful, but there was no shred of that interaction having taken place in this episode. I wanted to see Dwight cower a little in the face of Robert, or for Robert to further show that business intelligence and separation which in one instant pointed Dwight out as the cocksure, but kind of a fraud that he is.

    Also, I would have been fine with Stanley's new catchphrase if he didn't have a talking head explaining that it's "his new thing." Here's a man who is mostly miserable and usually wants nothing to do with his coworkers. Wouldn't it have been funny if, in a burst of anger toward someone, added "and you can shove it up you butt!" and the office bust out in laughter because they were so shocked such an uncharacteristic thing had come from Stanley. Stanley, not used to being liked or seen as a funny guy, then shows a little realization or smile of self approval or self confidence. Perhaps later he gives it another try and people laugh again. Soon enough and a few episodes in, Stanley could either be having a small character arc where he's finding that he can either be liked by others and/or that he is actually enjoying being liked by others. Who knows...instead, since he spelled it out so clearly and let us know it's his new thing, I could not listen to a single line read from Stanley without thinking, "he's going to add 'and shove it up your butt' at the end." What's the point of that? Writers of The Office, you've preempted your own punchline!

    Posted by Brando, 24/09/2011 4:49am (8 months ago)

  • I give it a..."hmmm, we'll have to wait and see." Maybe that's a cop out, but as you point out there is much yet to be seen with all of the new dynamics and what not. The best part of the episode for me was Robert California coming out and being very straightforward and not BSing anyone. It grounds him and makes him more credible as a character and as a CEO. I really hope he continues to be written as such.

    I thought the "planking" cold open was just awful. By continuously referencing YouTube fads (see also: Parkour, the wedding dance, Chocolate rain, etc.) the writers are not convincing me they are clever and able to make timely/funny cultural references...quite the opposite really.

    I agree with your thoughts on Darrel. It's so sad to see him gone from intelligent warehouse manager who didn't put up with Michael's nonsense to just another one of the crazies strewn about the office.

    Posted by Brando, 24/09/2011 4:14am (8 months ago)

  • Solid premiere, I enjoyed the cold opening which is always a good sign, and the new dynamic with Andy and California could be interesting. Obviously there were a few subplots from last year that we didn't see, so I'm hoping everything meshes together decently.

    The only part I didn't like was the "fight" between the two lines, Dwight and violence in the office has a bad track record with me.

    Posted by Ben F. , 23/09/2011 3:50pm (8 months ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments